Comments on: Lightroom Just Got Even Better…But It Still Needs This.

By: Rudi

Rudi — Wed, 29 May 2024 06:12:52 +0000

In reply to Gert Kracht. "Please don’t get the Adobe developers excited to change the import screen again, like the last time they try to change it." HaHa, yes! Thanx.

By: Andreas

Andreas — Mon, 27 May 2024 12:59:16 +0000

I think, Adobe will not add this because its right there 🙂
“Export with Preset”. I use a self defined preset “JPG full res”. If I want a quick JPG I simply click on “Export with Preset” and choose this preset and it will create a subfolder inside the RAW folder containing the JPG(s).

By: craig

craig — Sat, 25 May 2024 21:33:33 +0000

what is matte for? Is that a frame?

By: Gert Kracht

Gert Kracht — Sat, 25 May 2024 06:29:45 +0000

Please don’t get the Adobe developers excited to change the import screen again, like the last time they try to change it.
I was so happy to roll back to the previous version and watch that Adobe blog post explode with peoples reactions.

There is a thin line between Lr and LrC we have to preserve. For now a lot of LrC is made to work with local storage and I think it should be kept like that as long as there is no alternative for all customers.

The import screen is part of that: easy from-to destination drive. The only reason to change that would be: move everything to online. Which is way too slow and expensive right now. You need 1 Gbit up/down to meet the speed of a normal harddrive and those speeds are not available everywhere.

Graphic design changes could be an option, but keep the same options inside the screen, don’t change or remove them. Nor add something AI to that Window. It will slow down the whole workflow.